Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 August 2008
Published in Agron J 100:1303-1309 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0361
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, M.-O.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, M.-O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, M.-O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Animal Waste

MANURE

Yield and Nutrient Export of Grain Corn Fertilized with Raw and Treated Liquid Swine Manure

Martin H. Chantignya,*, Denis A. Angersa, Gilles Bélangera, Philippe Rochettea, Nikita Eriksen-Hamela, Shabtai Bittmanb, Katherine Buckleyc, Daniel Masséd and Marc-Olivier Gassere

a Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Soils and Crops Res. and Dev. Cent., 2560 Hochelaga Blvd, Québec, QC, Canada, G1V 2J3
b Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agric. Res. Cent., Box 1000, Agassiz, BC, Canada, V0M 1A0
c Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon Res. Cent., 18th St. & Grand Valley Road, Brandon, MB, Canada, R7A 5Y3;
d Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy Cattle and Swine Res. Cent., 2000 College St., C.P. 90, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1M 1Z3
e Inst. de recherche et de dév. en agroenvironnement, 2700 Einstein St., Québec, QC, Canada, G1P 3W8

* Corresponding author (chantignym{at}agr.gc.ca).

Treatment of liquid swine manure (LSM) is an option to improve nutrient management. Mineral fertilizer, raw LSM, and LSM treated by anaerobic digestion, flocculation, filtration, or natural decantation were sidedressed (100 kg N ha–1) to grain corn (Zea mays L.) on a clay and a loam soil. Over 3 yr, corn grain yield (6 to 11 Mg ha–1), N export (83 to 176 kg ha–1), and P export (19 to 40 kg ha–1) were similar among LSM types and between LSMs and mineral fertilizer. This was attributed to the immediate incorporation of LSM to minimize N volatilization. Treated LSMs reduced P input to soil by 3 to 24 kg ha–1, compared with raw LSM. This reduced corn P export by 2 to 4 kg ha–1 on the clay soil, but had no effect on the loam soil. Soil NO3 content after harvest was higher with the mineral fertilizer (19–31 kg NO3–N ha–1) than with LSMs (13–20 kg NO3–N ha–1) in the clay soil, but was similar for all treatments in the loam soil. We conclude that when sidedressed to corn and immediately incorporated, raw and treated LSMs have a fertilizer value similar to the mineral fertilizer. Moreover, the risk of postharvest NO3 accumulation with the raw and treated LSMs was similar to mineral fertilizer on the loam and lower on the clay.

Abbreviations: LSM, liquid swine manure • DM, dry matter • FUE, fertilizer use efficiency • ANR, apparent N recovery

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication November 1, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.