Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in Agron J 100:1155-1160 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0335
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiniry, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, G. W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kiniry, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kiniry, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Clover
Right arrow Cover Crops

AGROCLIMATOLOGY

Radiation Use Efficiency of Arrowleaf, Crimson, Rose, and Subterranean Clovers

James R. Kinirya,* and Gerald W. Eversb

a USDA-Agricultural Research Service, 808 E. Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502
b Texas AgriLife Extension Center, P. O. Box 200, Overton, TX 76564

* Corresponding author (jim.kiniry{at}ars.usda.gov).

Parameters describing the growth of cool-season annual clovers are necessary for potential growth simulations, but have not yet been determined. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to quantify and compare the key parameter for biomass production, radiation use efficiency (RUE), for arrowleaf (Trifolium vesiculosum Savi.), crimson (T. incarnatum L.), rose (T. hirtum All.), and subterranean (T. subterraneum L.) clovers. Data on the fraction of light intercepted and biomass were collected biweekly over 2 yr at Overton, TX, and were used to calculate the RUE. Radiation use efficiency was calculated for biomass as a function of cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR) for aboveground biomass and for total biomass including roots. Similarly, RUE was calculated for regrowth following one or two cuttings. Over the 2 yr of this study, the mean RUEs for aboveground biomass original growth were 2.92, 2.52, 1.94, and 1.86 g MJ–1 for rose, arrowleaf, crimson, and subterranean, respectively. The mean RUEs for the total biomass including roots, during this time were 3.01, 2.59, 2.00, and 1.98 g MJ–1, respectively. Relative to the original growth aboveground RUE values, the RUE of aboveground regrowth following one cutting averaged 92% across the four species. Likewise, the mean RUE of aboveground regrowth of the four species following two cuttings was 119%. These values of RUE will aid modelers in simulating these important N2 fixing species.

Abbreviations: IPAR, photosynthetically active radiation intercepted by plants, MJ m–2 d–1 • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation, MJ m–2 d–1 • PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density, RUE, radiation use efficiency

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication October 10, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.