Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in Agron J 100:1145-1154 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0343
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szumigalski, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Acker, R. C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Szumigalski, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Acker, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Szumigalski, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Acker, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Ecology
Right arrow Intercropping Systems

INTERCROPPING

Land Equivalent Ratios, Light Interception, and Water Use in Annual Intercrops in the Presence or Absence of In-Crop Herbicides

Anthony R. Szumigalskia and Rene C. Van Ackerb,*

a Dep. of Plant Science, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
b Dep. of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Bldg., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

* Corresponding author (vanacker{at}uoguelph.ca).

Increased crop production (overyielding) often observed in intercrops compared to sole crops has been attributed to enhanced resource use. The objective of this study was to investigate intercropping complementarity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), and field pea (Pisum arvense L.) for light and water use. Sole crop and intercrop combinations were evaluated for effects on land equivalent ratios (LERs), canopy light interception, soil moisture, water use (WU), and water use efficiency (WUE), with or without in-crop herbicides at two field sites in Manitoba, Canada. The mean LER was 1.1, but LERs varied greatly between site-years and herbicide treatments, and were significantly greater than one in 22% of the site-year-treatment combinations. The wheat-canola-pea and canola-pea intercrops showed the greatest frequency of overyielding for dry matter (50%) and grain yield (38%), respectively. Peak light interception tended to occur earlier with canola than with field pea, thus increasing the potential for light use complementarity between these crops. There was a positive correlation between LER and light interception in half of the site-years with applied herbicides and a negative correlation between LER and weed biomass at most site-years without herbicides. Although crop treatments used water differently within the soil profile, there were no differences in WU, but some differences in WUE, between crop treatments; however, WUE generally was not greater in intercrops compared to sole crops. In this study, overyielding in intercrops was inconsistent, and seemed to be related more to light interception than to water utilization.

Abbreviations: C, canola • CP, canola-pea • LER, land equivalent ratio • LSM, least squares mean • P, pea • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • W, single density wheat • WC, wheat-canola • WCP, wheat-canola-pea • WP, wheat-pea • WU, water use • WUE, water use efficiency • WW, double density wheat

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication December 1, 2006.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.