Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in Agron J 100:1106-1111 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0134
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bynum, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cothren, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bynum, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cothren, J. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bynum, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cothren, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Production Agriculture

COTTON

Indicators of Last Effective Boll Population and Harvest Aid Timing in Cotton

Josh B. Bynum* and J. Tom Cothren

Texas A&M University, 370 Olsen Blvd MS 2474, College Station, TX 77843

* Corresponding author (jbynum{at}ag.tamu.edu)

Maintaining profitable and sustainable production of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) relies on improvements in management. The objective of this study was to determine the proper defoliation timing to optimize lint yield and fiber quality through calculating heat unit (HU; DD15.5) accumulation beyond cutout, defined as five nodes above white flower (NAWF = 5). Experiments were conducted in Burleson County, Texas, in 2003 and 2004, on a Weswood silt loam soil (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, thermic, Udifluventic Halplustepts). Treatments were applied in a split-plot arrangement using a randomized complete block design with four replications. The main plots consisted of three nodal positions (NAWF = 3, 4, and 5) and the five subplots were HUs (361, 417, 472, 528, and 583) accumulated beyond the corresponding nodal positions (NAWF), at which time a tank-mix of harvest aids was applied. Immediately before defoliation, 10 plants plot–1 were evaluated for percent open boll (POB) and nodes above cracked boll (NACB). Lint yield was detrimentally impacted in south central Texas when defoliation was initiated at 472 HUs beyond NAWF = 5. Defoliation at 60 POB resulted in as much as 29% more lint yield than defoliation based on the current benchmark of NAWF = 5 plus 472 HUs. This finding suggests NAWF = 5 is neither an indicator of the last effective flower population in all production locations, nor a proper guide for timing cutout on which end-of-season management decisions should be based in south central Texas.

Abbreviations: DAT, days after treatment • HU, heat unit [(maximum temperature + minimum temperature)/2– 15.5 in °C] • HVI, high volume instrument • NACB, nodes above cracked boll • NAWF, nodes above white flower • POB, percent open boll • POBD, percent open boll at defoliation • POBH, percent open boll at harvest

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication April 10, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.