Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 May 2008
Published in Agron J 100:845-854 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0247
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Sugarcane
Right arrow Nutrient Management

SUGARCANE

Sugarcane Response to Mill Mud, Fertilizer, and Soybean Nutrient Sources on a Sandy Soil

Robert A. Gilberta,*, Dolen R. Morrisb, Curtis R. Rainbolta, James M. McCraya, Raul E. Perdomoc, Barney Eilandc, Gerard Powellc and German Montesc

a Univ. of Florida, EREC, 3200 E. Palm Beach Rd., Belle Glade, FL, 33430
b USDA-ARS, Sugarcane Field Station, 12990 US Hwy. 441, Canal Point, FL 33438
c Florida Crystals Corp., P.O. Box 86, South Bay, FL 33493

* Corresponding author (ragilber{at}ufl.edu).

Improving soil organic matter and soil fertility are important factors in the sustainability of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) production. A 3-yr field trial was established in 2004 on a sandy Alfisol in Florida to compare the effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on sugarcane production. The three nutrient sources were (i) mill mud (filter cake, cachaza), (ii) local standard fertilizer, and (iii) soybean cropping system before sugarcane. Soybean green manure increased sucrose yield (TSH, t sucrose ha–1) 20% in plant cane, however when aboveground biomass was removed soybean rotation did not improve sugarcane yields. Fertilization did not increase yields if mill mud was added to plant cane. Soybean green manure did not improve sugarcane ratoon crop yields, and there were no significant interactions in the ratoon crops. The application of mill mud resulted in a 49% TSH increase in first ratoon and a 167% increase in second ratoon whereas inorganic fertilizer application increased TSH by 31 and 49% in first and second ratoon, respectively. Over the 3-yr crop cycle, addition of mill mud alone led to an increase of 4.1 TSH compared with inorganic fertilizer alone, whereas soybean green manure alone produced 2.6 TSH less than fertilizer. However, combinations of nutrient sources with mill mud had additive effects in the ratoon crops. Our results indicate that mill mud was more effective than soybean green manure or local standard fertilizer practices in increasing sugarcane yields on sand. However, growers should fertilize ratoon crops when mill mud has been applied to achieve maximum sugarcane yields.

Abbreviations: C, previous cropping system • DAP, d after planting • IPAR, incident photosynthetically active radiation • KST, sucrose concentration • LAI, leaf area index • TCH, biomass yield • TPAR, transmitted photosynthetically active radiation • TSH, sucrose yield

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication July 18, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.