Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 May 2008
Published in Agron J 100:779-782 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0254N
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steele, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rundquist, D. C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steele, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rundquist, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Steele, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rundquist, D. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Analytical Solutions
Right arrow Other Approaches
Right arrow Data acquisition and assimilation
Right arrow Other Crops

NOTES & UNIQUE PHENOMENA

A Comparison of Two Techniques for Nondestructive Measurement of Chlorophyll Content in Grapevine Leaves

Mark R. Steelea,b, Anatoly A. Gitelsonc,* and Donald C. Rundquistc

a Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies (CALMIT), School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0517
b Agricultural Research and Development Center, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Ithaca, NE 68033-2234
c Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies (CALMIT), School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0517

* Corresponding author (agitelson2{at}unl.edu).

Traditional methods for chlorophyll (Chl) measurement include wet chemical extractions and handheld Chl meters. The recent availability of small and affordable radiometers has provided means to estimate Chl from reflectance measurements. This paper compares the performance of a handheld SPAD Chl meter and a recently developed Red Edge Chlorophyll Index (CIred edge) for Chl estimation in grapevine (Vitis spp.) leaves. Leaves were sampled and Chl was quantified using these two methods. Both techniques were compared against grapevine-leaf Chl as analyzed using standard laboratory procedures. Both SPAD and CIred edge were equally accurate in measuring Chl < 300 mg/m2. However, at higher Chl, SPAD sensitivity declined and the CIred edge accuracy was much higher than that of SPAD. The Chl index was found to be capable of accurately estimating pigment contents across a greater range than the SPAD, thus it can be used for quantitative assessment of early stages of plant stress.

Abbreviations: Chl, chlorophyll • CIred edge, Red Edge Chlorophyll Index

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication July 24, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.