Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 May 2008
Published in Agron J 100:591-599 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0190
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Organic farming
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Nutrient Management

CROPPING SYSTEMS

Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems

Perry R. Millera,*, David E. Buschenab, Clain A. Jonesa and Jeffrey A. Holmesa

a Dep. Land Resources and Environ. Sci., Montana State Univ., 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
b Dep. Agric. Econ. and Econ., Montana State Univ., 306 Linfield Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717-2920

* Corresponding author (pmiller{at}montana.edu).

Transition to no-till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4-yr rotations, including a pulse (lentil [Lens culinaris Medik.] or pea [Pisum sativum L.]), an oilseed (canola [Brassica napus L.] or sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.]) and two cereal crops (corn [Zea mays L.], proso millet [Panicum miliaceum L.], or wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]). No-till continuous wheat was also included. The ORG system included a green manure (pea), wheat, lentil, and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and received no inputs. Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality, even though 117 kg N ha–1 was applied to the NT winter wheat. After 4 yr, soil nitrate-N and Olsen-P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system. After 4 yr, total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per-ha basis. Studying simultaneous transition to diversified NT and ORG cropping systems was instructive for increased sustainability.

Abbreviations: NT, no-till • NTS, system that emphasized only cool-season spring crops • NTW, system that emphasized winter crops • NTD, system that was highly diversified • NTCW, continuous wheat system alternating annually between spring wheat and winter wheat • ORG, organic • PMN, potentially mineralizable N • SOM, soil organic matter

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication June 3, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.