Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 26 February 2008
Published in Agron J 100:315-319 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0127
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramasubramaniam, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, C. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ramasubramaniam, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, C. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ramasubramaniam, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, C. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Plant Disease

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Estimates of Yield and Economic Losses Associated with White Mold of Rain-Fed Dry Bean in North Dakota

Harikrishnan Ramasubramaniama, Luis E. del Río Mendozaa,* and Carl A. Bradleyb

a Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
b Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Illiniois, Urbana-Champaign

* Corresponding author (luis.delrio-mendoza{at}ndsu.edu).

White mold [caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary] of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important disease affecting rain-fed dry bean yields in North Dakota. The economic impact of this disease in North Dakota was assessed through a survey of 250 fields during 2003 to 2005. Profitability of a single fungicide application for managing white mold also was examined. Yield loss was estimated by regressing the mean of white mold incidence per county and year with their respective estimated yields. The slope of the resulting equation was divided by its intercept and multiplied by 100 to express yield loss as percentage of potential yield. Results of these analyses indicated a loss of 14 kg/ha (R2 0.50; P = 0.03) for every unit of white mold incidence, which represents a loss of 0.8% of the potential yield. The economic impact of the disease was assessed using estimated hectarage with ≥20% white mold incidence in conjunction with yield and dry bean prices as reported by National Agricultural Statistics Service for North Dakota. Over the 3-yr period, economic losses were highest in 2004 and least in 2005; yield loss averaged 524 kg/ha (range 424–722 kg/ha) while production loss averaged 6433 t (range 1,789–10,438 t). These represent an average economic loss of U.S. $2.95 million (range U.S. $0.63–5.74 million) per year. Profitability of a fungicide application to manage white mold was heavily influenced by disease pressure and varied widely between years. In years with high disease pressure, like 2004, a fungicide application would have produced a positive return in 72% of the fields; but under moderate to low disease-pressure, applying fungicides would have been a profitable practice in <20% of fields.

Abbreviations: NASS, National Agricultural Statistics Service • PL, loss of potential yield

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication April 9, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.