HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Strydhorst, S. M. Articles by Harker, K. N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Strydhorst, S. M. Articles by Harker, K. N. Agricola Articles by Strydhorst, S. M. Articles by Harker, K. N. Related Collections Other Legumes Intercropping Systems Other Forage Crops

INTERCROPPING

Forage Potential of Intercropping Barley with Faba Bean, Lupin, or Field Pea

^a Dep. of Agric., Food, and Nutritional Sci., 4-10 Agriculture-Forestry Cent., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5
^b Alberta Agric. and Food, Agric. Res. Division, Barrhead, AB, Canada T7N 1A4
^c Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Res. Cent., 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada T4L 1W1

^* Corresponding author (sheryl{at}ualberta.ca).

Annual cool-season grain legumes grown in mixtures with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), may offer advantages over barley sole crops for forage production. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of intercropping ‘Snowbird’ tannin-free faba bean (Vicia faba L.), ‘Arabella’ narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.), and ‘Cutlass’ field pea (Pisum sativum L.), along with legume planting densities (LPD) on forage yields, nutritive value, and economic returns. Field studies were conducted at three sites in the Parkland region of Alberta, Canada, in 2004 and 2005. Each legume was planted at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0x their recommended sole crop planting density with ‘Niobe’ barley at 0.25x the recommended sole crop planting density. A barley sole crop was also included for comparison. Increasing the LPD from 0.5 to 2.0x did not effect forage dry matter (DM) but it increased the proportion of legume in the forage DM from 39 to 63%, protein concentration from 119 to 132 g kg^–1, and acid detergent lignin (ADL) from 36 to 42 g kg^–1 while it decreased neutral detergent fiber (NDF) from 465 to 422 g kg^–1. Faba bean–barley, lupin–barley, and pea–barley intercrops had 64, 27, and 55% higher protein yields, respectively, compared to sole crop barley. Faba bean–barley and lupin–barley had similar forage DM yields which were 1.5 Mg ha^–1 and 1.3 Mg ha^–1 less than pea–barley and sole barley crops, respectively. Intercrops of Cutlass pea and Niobe barley offered the most favorable combination of forage DM yields, nutritive value, and economic returns.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • ADL, acid detergent lignin • CP, crude protein • DM, dry matter • LPD, legume planting density • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • RFV, relative feed value